Δημοσίευση

National curves of foetal growth in singleton foetuses of Greek origin.

ΤίτλοςNational curves of foetal growth in singleton foetuses of Greek origin.
Publication TypeJournal Article
Year of Publication2016
AuthorsSotiriadis, A., Eleftheriades M., Chatzinikolaou F., Hassiakos D., Chrousos G. P., & Pervanidou P.
JournalEur J Clin Invest
Volume46
Issue5
Pagination425-33
Date Published2016 May
ISSN1365-2362
Λέξεις κλειδιάAbdomen, Adult, Anthropometry, Biometry, Cephalometry, European Continental Ancestry Group, Female, Femur, Fetal Development, Fetus, Gestational Age, Greece, Growth Charts, Head, Humans, Memory, Episodic, Pregnancy, Pregnancy Trimester, Second, Pregnancy Trimester, Third, Reference Values, Ultrasonography, Prenatal
Abstract

BACKGROUND: Foetal growth monitoring is an essential component of prenatal care with postnatal impact. The aim of the study was to construct reference ranges for foetal biometric parameters in Greek foetuses and to compare them with previously published models.MATERIALS AND METHODS: Measurements from 1200 Greek foetuses were used to construct normal curves for biparietal diameter (BPD), occipitofrontal diameter (OFD), head circumference (HC), abdominal circumference (AC), femoral length (FL) and the BPD/FL ratio according to the methodology described by Royston and Wright (1998). The model was validated in a second group of 1200 different foetuses using analysis of the corresponding standardized residuals (z-scores). The z-scores which were derived by our model were compared to those calculated using previously published models from other populations.RESULTS: BPD, OFD, HC, AC, FL and the BPD/FL ratio are accurately described by simple quadratic equations (R(2) > 0·96 for most of the parameters tested). Statistically significant differences were observed for most of the z-scores when our models were compared to previously published models. Less than 10% of our foetuses were < 5th or > 95th centile of the latter models. About 10% of our foetuses were > 95th centile for FL and HC when the INTERGROWTH-21st formulas were used.CONCLUSION: We present national foetal biometric references. Using charts from other populations (including INTERGROWTH-21st) may be unrepresentative of local populations and lead to misclassification of foetal growth status.

DOI10.1111/eci.12611
Alternate JournalEur. J. Clin. Invest.
PubMed ID26915530

Επικοινωνία

Γραμματεία Τμήματος Ιατρικής T.K. 54124 Θεσσαλονίκη
 

Συνδεθείτε

Το τμήμα Ιατρικής στα social networks.
Ακολουθήστε μας ή συνδεθείτε μαζί μας.