Δημοσίευση

Randomized phase III clinical trial comparing the combination of capecitabine and oxaliplatin (CAPOX) with the combination of 5-fluorouracil, leucovorin and oxaliplatin (modified FOLFOX6) as adjuvant therapy in patients with operated high-risk stage II or

ΤίτλοςRandomized phase III clinical trial comparing the combination of capecitabine and oxaliplatin (CAPOX) with the combination of 5-fluorouracil, leucovorin and oxaliplatin (modified FOLFOX6) as adjuvant therapy in patients with operated high-risk stage II or
Publication TypeJournal Article
Year of Publication2015
AuthorsPectasides, D., Karavasilis V., Papaxoinis G., Gourgioti G., Makatsoris T., Raptou G., Vrettou E., Sgouros J., Samantas E., Basdanis G., Papakostas P., Bafaloukos D., Kotoula V., Kalofonos H. P., Scopa C. D., Pentheroudakis G., & Fountzilas G.
JournalBMC Cancer
Volume15
Pagination384
Date Published2015
ISSN1471-2407
Λέξεις κλειδιάAdult, Aged, Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols, Capecitabine, Colorectal Neoplasms, Female, Fluorouracil, Humans, Leucovorin, Male, Microsatellite Instability, Middle Aged, Neoplasm Staging, Organoplatinum Compounds, Proto-Oncogene Proteins, Proto-Oncogene Proteins B-raf, ras Proteins
Abstract

BACKGROUND: The aim of the trial was to compare two active adjuvant chemotherapy regimens in patients with early stage colorectal cancer (CRC).METHODS: Patients were assigned to oxaliplatin, leucovorin and 5-FU for 12 cycles (group A, FOLFOX6) or oxaliplatin and capecitabine for eight cycles (group B, CAPOX). Primary endpoint was disease-free survival (DFS). Tumors were classified as mismatch repair proficient (pMMR) or deficient (dMMR) according to MLH1, PMS2, MSH2 and MSH6 protein expression. KRAS exon two and BRAF V600E mutational status were also assessed.RESULTS: Between 2005 and 2008, 441 patients were enrolled, with 408 patients being eligible. After a median follow-up of 74.7 months, 3-year DFS was 79.8 % (95 % CI 76.5-83.4) in the FOLFOX group and 79.5 % (95 % CI 75.9-83.1) in the CAPOX group (p = 0.78). Three-year OS was 87.2 % (95 % CI 84.1-91.1) in the FOLFOX and 86.9 % (95 % CI 83.4-89.9) in the CAPOX group (p = 0.84). Among 306 available tumors, 11.0 % were dMMR, 34.0 % KRAS mutant and 4.9 % BRAF mutant. Multivariate analysis showed that primary site in the left colon, earlier TNM stage and the presence of anemia at diagnosis were associated with better DFS and overall survival (OS), while grade one-two tumors were associated with better OS. Finally, a statistically significant interaction was detected between the primary site and MMR status (p = 0.010), while KRAS mutated tumors were associated with shorter DFS. However, the sample was too small for safe conclusions.CONCLUSIONS: No significant differences were observed in the efficacy of FOLFOX versus CAPOX as adjuvant treatment in high-risk stage II or stage III CRC patients, but definitive conclusions cannot be drawn because of the small sample size.TRIAL REGISTRATION: ANZCTR 12610000509066 . Date of Registration: June 21, 2010.

DOI10.1186/s12885-015-1406-7
Alternate JournalBMC Cancer
PubMed ID25956750
PubMed Central IDPMC4445286

Επικοινωνία

Τμήμα Ιατρικής, Πανεπιστημιούπολη ΑΠΘ, T.K. 54124, Θεσσαλονίκη
 

Συνδεθείτε

Το τμήμα Ιατρικής στα κοινωνικά δίκτυα.
Ακολουθήστε μας ή συνδεθείτε μαζί μας.