The english version of the website is under development. Wherever text appears in Greek, it means it has not been translated yet.

Δημοσίευση

Systemic therapy for chromophobe renal cell carcinoma: A systematic review.

TitleSystemic therapy for chromophobe renal cell carcinoma: A systematic review.
Publication TypeJournal Article
Year of Publication2020
AuthorsPapanikolaou, D., Ioannidou P., Koukourikis P., Moysidis K., Meditskou S., Koutsoumparis D., Hatzimouratidis K., & Hatzivassiliou E.
JournalUrol Oncol
Volume38
Issue4
Pagination137-149
Date Published2020 04
ISSN1873-2496
Abstract

BACKGROUND: Chromophobe renal cell carcinoma (chRCC) subtype accounts for almost 5% of total RCC cases. It carries the best prognosis among the rest of RCC types. However, patients with metastatic chRCC disease have worse prognosis than patients with advanced clear cell RCC. Furthermore, available data regarding systemic therapy for chRCC patients are scarce and confusing.AIM: The aim of this systematic review is to search for and critically appraise studies that investigate the results of systemic therapies in patients diagnosed with metastatic chRCC disease.METHODS: Search strategy included PUBMED, CENTRAL, clinicaltrials.gov databases, and abstracts of major conferences with a focus on urologic oncology (till March 2019). Studies investigating patients that were treated with systemic therapy for advanced chRCC disease were included. Primary outcomes were progression-free survival and objective response rate. Secondary outcome was overall survival. Screening of available studies was carried out by 2 groups of reviewers, as well as the quality assessment of the included studies.RESULTS: The systematic search yielded 369 studies, of which 15 studies (2 randomized control trials and 13 cohort studies), involving 183 patients, met the eligibility criteria. The 2 randomized control trials that directly compared sunitinib vs. everolimus, suggested an advantage for sunitinib without being statistically significant. Furthermore, sunitinib seems to be superior than sorafenib at least in terms of objective response rate. Regarding mTOR inhibitors, they may have a role in a specific subset of chRCC patients, that needs to be further explored. Finally, as far as immunotherapy is concerned, available data suggest that chRCC seems to be resistant to recent immune check point inhibitors, since just a few tumor responses were observed with the administered immunotherapy regiments.CONCLUSION: The optimum therapy for metastatic chRCC is still missing, as results from ongoing trials are awaited. More studies, of high quality and adequate sample size, that will be based on the specific biology of chRCC, have to be carried out in order to identify the best treatment.

DOI10.1016/j.urolonc.2019.11.006
Alternate JournalUrol Oncol
PubMed ID31953002

Contact

Secretariat of the School of Medicine
 

Connect

School of Medicine's presence in social networks
Follow Us or Connect with us.