The english version of the website is under development. Wherever text appears in Greek, it means it has not been translated yet.

Δημοσίευση

Use of log-scaled crowded visual acuity charts in clinical studies regarding amblyopia.

TitleUse of log-scaled crowded visual acuity charts in clinical studies regarding amblyopia.
Publication TypeJournal Article
Year of Publication2019
AuthorsMataftsi, A., Kappos N., Riga P., Kokkali S., Malamaki P., Brazitikos P., & Haidich A-B.
JournalGraefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol
Volume257
Issue3
Pagination639-644
Date Published2019 Mar
ISSN1435-702X
KeywordsAmblyopia, Child, Clinical Trials as Topic, Humans, Journal Impact Factor, Odds Ratio, Ophthalmology, Periodicals as Topic, Reproducibility of Results, Retrospective Studies, Vision Tests, Visual Acuity
Abstract

PURPOSE: Log-scaled crowded charts using standardized testing protocol are essential for precise and reproducible visual acuity (VA) testing regarding amblyopia. Despite common acceptance of these standards, current VA testing clinical practice shows considerable diversity. The purpose of this retrospective literature review was to investigate the methodology of VA measurement and reporting in pediatric ophthalmology literature regarding amblyopia.METHODS: We searched PubMed for clinical trials regarding amblyopia, published from January 1994 to July 2016. Primary outcomes included VA measurement methodology, namely use of (a) log-scaled chart, (b) crowded chart, and (c) specified testing protocol. The study design, publication year, and the journal's impact factor were analyzed in relation to the primary outcomes.RESULTS: Out of the 165 initial reports, 150 were included. VA was measured with a log-scaled chart in 65%, with a crowded chart in 57%, and with a specified protocol in 51% of studies. All three criteria were met in 43% of studies and in multivariable logistic model, they were associated with more recent publication year (odds ratio [OR] = 1.11, 95% confidence interval [95%CI] = 1.03-1.20) and were more likely to be present in higher impact factor journals (OR = 1.42, 95%CI = 1.17-1.72) or randomized controlled trials (OR = 3.09, 95%CI = 1.44-6.59).CONCLUSIONS: In the last two decades, more than half of clinical trials addressing amblyopia have not followed the recommended methodology for optimal visual acuity assessment. Thus, their measurements may have been contaminated with noise, and their respective results and conclusions may include errors. Adhering to optimal, standardized methodology is key to progress in both clinical and research grounds.

DOI10.1007/s00417-018-04235-5
Alternate JournalGraefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol
PubMed ID30675642

Contact

Secretariat of the School of Medicine
 

Connect

School of Medicine's presence in social networks
Follow Us or Connect with us.