The english version of the website is under development. Wherever text appears in Greek, it means it has not been translated yet.

Δημοσίευση

Use of chimney grafts in aortic arch pathologies involving the supra-aortic branches.

TitleUse of chimney grafts in aortic arch pathologies involving the supra-aortic branches.
Publication TypeJournal Article
Year of Publication2011
AuthorsGehringhoff, B., Torsello G., Pitoulias G. A., Austermann M., & Donas K. P.
JournalJ Endovasc Ther
Volume18
Issue5
Pagination650-5
Date Published2011 Oct
ISSN1545-1550
KeywordsAdult, Aged, Aorta, Thoracic, Aortic Diseases, Aortography, Blood Vessel Prosthesis, Blood Vessel Prosthesis Implantation, Carotid Artery, Common, Endovascular Procedures, Female, Germany, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Prosthesis Design, Stents, Subclavian Artery, Time Factors, Tomography, X-Ray Computed, Treatment Outcome, Ultrasonography, Doppler, Duplex
Abstract

PURPOSE: To present a clinical experience with the use of chimney grafts in the endovascular repair of aortic arch pathologies involving the supra-aortic branches.METHODS: The chimney technique consists of endovascular stent or stent-graft placement parallel to the main aortic stent-graft in order to preserve or rescue flow to aortic branch vessels and to allow proximal extension of endograft fixation zones. Between April 2009 and January 2011, 9 patients (7 men; mean age 58 years, range 39-76) had chimney grafts installed to the left subclavian artery (LSA) or left common carotid artery (LCCA) during urgent thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) of 5 aortic arch aneurysms, a mobile aortic thrombus with peripheral embolism, symptomatic type B dissection, penetrating aortic ulcer, and persistent type I endoleak after TEVAR. Eight chimney grafts were implanted into the LSA in 6 patients and 5 into the LCCA in the other 3 patients.RESULTS: The immediate technical success was 88.9%. The post-TEVAR type I endoleak persisted despite the chimney graft; the patient underwent surgical arch replacement. One patient died within 30 days due to cardiac insufficiency. There were 2 access site complications requiring surgery (brachial artery pseudoaneurysm and heavily calcified femoral artery puncture site). Over a median follow-up of 15 months (range 4-22), all chimney grafts remained patent in the 7 surviving and successfully treated patients.CONCLUSION: The use of chimney grafts in selected aortic arch pathologies with involvement of supra-aortic branches is safe and feasible. Long-term results and large series are needed in order to draw robust conclusions regarding this promising alternative endovascular technique.

DOI10.1583/11-3504.1
Alternate JournalJ. Endovasc. Ther.
PubMed ID21992634

Contact

Secretariat of the School of Medicine
 

Connect

School of Medicine's presence in social networks
Follow Us or Connect with us.