The english version of the website is under development. Wherever text appears in Greek, it means it has not been translated yet.

Δημοσίευση

Native tissue repair versus mesh repair in pelvic organ prolapse surgery.

TitleNative tissue repair versus mesh repair in pelvic organ prolapse surgery.
Publication TypeJournal Article
Year of Publication2017
AuthorsKalkan, U., Yoldemir T., Ozyurek E. S., & Daniilidis A.
JournalClimacteric
Volume20
Issue6
Pagination510-517
Date Published2017 Dec
ISSN1473-0804
KeywordsFemale, Humans, Pelvic Organ Prolapse, Surgical Mesh, Suture Techniques
Abstract

In pelvic organ prolapse, the anatomical defects develop at the anterior (anterior vaginal wall), the posterior (posterior vaginal wall) and the apical (the uterus/cervix or the apex of the vagina, vaginal vault or cuff scar after hysterectomy) compartments. These defects occur in more than one compartment. Treatment of pelvic organ prolapse is commonly surgical, aiming to restore the anatomy of structures supporting the pelvic organs. The surgical repair techniques are classified as 'native tissue repair (NTR)' when only pelvic organ support tissues are used and 'augmented repair (AR)' when some other material (prosthesis or graft) is used to reinforce the defective support system. In this review, issues related to the basic science of meshes, and NTR versus mesh or graft AR procedures for pelvic organ prolapse are discussed while considering the varying risks and benefits according to the prolapsed compartment.

DOI10.1080/13697137.2017.1366978
Alternate JournalClimacteric
PubMed ID28872932

Contact

Secretariat of the School of Medicine
 

Connect

School of Medicine's presence in social networks
Follow Us or Connect with us.