The english version of the website is under development. Wherever text appears in Greek, it means it has not been translated yet.

Δημοσίευση

Lung Ultrasound-Guided Dry-Weight Reduction in Hemodialysis Patients Does Not Affect Short-Term Blood Pressure Variability.

TitleLung Ultrasound-Guided Dry-Weight Reduction in Hemodialysis Patients Does Not Affect Short-Term Blood Pressure Variability.
Publication TypeJournal Article
Year of Publication2019
AuthorsLoutradis, C., Sarafidis P. A., Theodorakopoulou M., Ekart R., Alexandrou M. Eleni, Pyrgidis N., Angeloudi E., Tzanis G., Toumpourleka M., Papadopoulou D., Mallamaci F., Zoccali C., & Papagianni A.
JournalAm J Hypertens
Volume32
Issue8
Pagination786-795
Date Published2019 07 17
ISSN1941-7225
KeywordsAged, Blood Pressure, Blood Pressure Monitoring, Ambulatory, Female, Greece, Humans, Hypertension, Kidney Failure, Chronic, Lung, Male, Middle Aged, Predictive Value of Tests, Pulmonary Edema, Renal Dialysis, Single-Blind Method, Time Factors, Treatment Outcome, Ultrasonography, Weight Loss
Abstract

BACKGROUND: Increased short-term blood pressure (BP) variability (BPV) in hemodialysis is associated with increased cardiovascular and all-cause mortality. Studies on the impact of BP-lowering interventions on BPV are scarce. This study examined the effect of dry-weight reduction with a lung ultrasound-guided strategy on short-term BPV in hemodialysis patients with hypertension.METHODS: This is a prespecified analysis of a randomized clinical trial in 71 hemodialysis patients with hypertension, assigned in a 1:1 ratio in the active group, following a strategy for dry-weight reduction guided by pre-hemodialysis lung ultrasound and the control group following standard-of-care treatment. All patients underwent 48-hour ambulatory BP monitoring at baseline and after 8 weeks. BPV was calculated with validated formulas for the 48-hour interval and the 2 daytime and nighttime periods.RESULTS: Dry-weight changes were -0.71 ± 1.39 in active vs. +0.51 ± 0.98 kg in the control group (P < 0.001), generating a between-group difference of 5.9/3.5 mm Hg (P < 0.05) in 48-hour BP at study end. All brachial BPV indices [SD, weighted SD, coefficient of variation, and average real variability (ARV)] did not change significantly from baseline to study end in the active [systolic blood pressure (SBP)-ARV: 12.58 ± 3.37 vs. 11.91 ± 3.13, P = 0.117; diastolic blood pressure (DBP)-ARV: 9.14 ± 1.47 vs. 8.80 ± 1.96, P = 0.190] or control (SBP-ARV: 11.33 ± 2.76 vs. 11.07 ± 2.51, P = 0.544; DBP-ARV: 8.38 ± 1.50 vs. 8.15 ± 1.49, P = 0.295) group (between-group comparison P = 0.211/0.117). Aortic BPV indices followed a similar pattern. Likewise, no significant changes in BPV indices for the daytime and nighttime periods were noted in both groups during follow-up.CONCLUSIONS: This study is the first to evaluate the effects of a nonpharmacological intervention on short-term BPV in hemodialysis, showing no effect of dry-weight reduction on BPV, despite BP decrease.

DOI10.1093/ajh/hpz064
Alternate JournalAm J Hypertens
PubMed ID31162530

Contact

Secretariat of the School of Medicine
 

Connect

School of Medicine's presence in social networks
Follow Us or Connect with us.